Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants



 
 

§ 7.115 (B)

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

(B)  Sentence Based on Prior Conviction Resulting From Denial of Other Rights.  Post-conviction relief may be used to attack a sentence enhanced by convictions that are unconstitutional on grounds other than complete denial of the right to counsel.  Custis restricts how the defense can establish this, but does not undercut the right to have a sentence vacated if a proper post-conviction proceeding establishes that the prior conviction violated the Constitution.[408]


[408] Garcia v. Superior Court, 14 Cal.4th 953, 962 (1997); People v. Allen, 21 Cal.4th 424, 432 (1999); see Nichols v. United States, 511 U.S. 738, 765 (dis. opn. of Ginsberg, J.) (the issue in Custis “was where, not whether, the defendant could attack a prior conviction for constitutional infirmity”).)

Updates

 

Ninth Circuit

ALMANDAREZ-TORRES DOES NOT APPLY WHERE NATURE OF CRIME CHANGES
United States v. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, __ F.3d __ (9th Cir. Feb. 19, 2004) (Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998) (prior offense may be used to increase sentence even if omitted in Government pleading), does not apply when the earlier offense operated not merely to increase defendant's sentence, but to transform his second offense from misdemeanor to felony).
http://www.ilw.com/lawyers/immigdaily/cases/2004,0227-Rodriguez.pdf

 

TRANSLATE