Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants



 
 

§ 7.67 1. Any Ground Will Do

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

Under current law, a criminal-court order changing a sentence for any reason — whether or not the prior sentence was legally invalid — is effective to remove the adverse immigration consequences of the prior sentence, because of the long-standing rule that the most recent criminal sentence in a criminal case is the sentence that counts for immigration purposes.[195]

 


[195] Matter of Song, 23 I. & N. Dec. 173 (BIA 2001) (new definition of “conviction” and Matter of Roldan, 22 I. & N. Dec. 486 (BIA 1999), removal orders reversed sub nom. Lujan-Armendariz v. INS, 222 F.3d 728 (9th Cir. 2000), do not alter the rule that vacating a sentence nunc pro tunc and imposing a revised sentence of less than 364 days will prevent the conviction from being considered an aggravated felony because the latest sentence controls for immigration purposes); Matter of Martin, 18 I. & N. Dec. 226 (BIA 1982) (correction of illegal sentence); Matter of H, 9 I. & N. Dec. 380 (BIA 1961) (new trial and sentence); Matter of J, 6 I. & N. Dec. 562 (AG 1956) (commutation).

 

TRANSLATE