Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants



 
 

§ 7.75 1. The Right to Counsel

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

There is an unqualified right to the assistance of counsel at the sentencing hearing, as sentencing is a critical stage of the proceedings.[210]  A defendant may waive his or her right to the assistance of counsel at sentencing, but such a waiver must be knowing and voluntary under Faretta v. California.[211]  The defendant who seeks to proceed pro se must be fully informed of the ramifications of that decision,[212] including being advised of the “three elements” of self-representation.  S/he must be “‘made aware of (1) the nature of the charges against him [or her]; (2) the possible penalties; and (3) the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation.’”[213]  Any waiver of the right to counsel in the absence of such warnings renders the waiver unknowing and hence unconstitutional.


[210] Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U.S. 128 (1967). 

[211] Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975). 

[212] See id. at 835 (“Although a defendant need not himself have the skill and experience of a lawyer in order to competently and intelligently choose self-representation, he should be made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, so that the record will establish that ‘he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with eyes open.’”).

[213] United States v. Hernandez, 203 F.3d 614, 624 (9th Cir. 2000).

 

TRANSLATE