Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants



 
 

§ 7.110 11. Mental Incompetence at Sentence

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

            Where the issue of mental incompetency to be sentenced is raised after guilt has been established, the court should stay imposition of sentence and commit the defendant civilly until s/he has recovered competency.[390]  It is cruel and inhumane, in violation of due process, to sentence a defendant who is mentally incompetent.[391]  The test of mental incompetency to be sentenced is whether the defendant is able to understand the nature and purpose of the proceedings or to explain why sentence should not be imposed.[392]


[390] Wiehofen, Mental Disorder as a Criminal Defense 459-463 (1954), and cases cited.

[391] Hall v. United States, 410 F.2d 653 (4th Cir. 1969); Bennett v. Hunter, 155 F.2d 223 (10th Cir. 1946); People v. Perry, 14 Cal. 2d 387, 397-98, 94 P.2d 559 (1939).

[392] See Moss v. Hunter, 167 F.2d 683 (10th Cir. 1948); Hampton v. Tinsley, 240 F. Supp. 213 (D. Colo. 1965); People v. Field, 108 Cal.App.2d 496, 238 P.2d 1052 (1951).

 

TRANSLATE