Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants



 
 

§ 7.91 D. Substantive Constitutional Guarantees

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

 

Updates

 

POST CON " SENTENCE " GROUNDS " EX POST FACTO " PLAIN ERROR " STANDARD OF REVIEW
United States v. Marcus, 130 S.Ct. 2159 (May 24, 2010) (the Second Circuit's reversal of defendant's forced labor and sex trafficking conviction is reversed where the Second Circuit's plain error standard, under which a retrial was necessary whenever there was any possibility, no matter how unlikely, that the jury could have convicted based exclusively on defendant's conduct prior to the enactment of the statute under which he was charged, was inconsistent with the Supreme Court's approach to plain error, under which: 1) the error must affect the appellant's substantial rights, which in the ordinary case means it affected the outcome of the district court proceedings; and 2) the error must seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings).

Seventh Circuit

POST CON RELIEF " SENTENCE " GROUNDS " SENTENCING COURT MUST CONSIDER AND RULE UPON ALL PRINCIPAL ARGUMENTS
United States v. Olmeda-Garcia, 613 F.3d 721 (7th Cir. Jul. 29, 2010) (sentencing court is only required to respond to principal arguments raised by a defendant).

 

TRANSLATE