Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants



 
 

§ 7.90 (B)

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

(B)  Ineffective legal argument at sentence.[273]


[273] Gentry v. Roe, 320 F.3d 891 (9th Cir. August 8, 2002), reversed by Yarborough v. Gentry, 124 S.Ct. 1 (October 20, 2003) (ineffective assistance shown where trial counsel elected, in closing argument, to ignore evidence on record that would help client and highlight detrimental record and non-record evidence, which did not fall within the area of legitimate “trial strategy”). But see Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685 (May 28, 2002) (state court finding that defense counsel’s failure to present mitigating evidence at sentencing and waiver of closing argument did not amount to ineffective assistance was neither “contrary to” nor an “unreasonable application” of federal law under Strickland standard).

 

TRANSLATE