Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants



 
 

§ 7.102 3. Notice and Opportunity to Be Heard

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

The defendant has a right to sufficient notice of, and an opportunity to respond to, information on which the sentence will be based.[321]  Due process requires the prosecution and court to give sufficient advance notice of, and an opportunity to refute, the facts the prosecution intends to prove at sentencing.[322]  Due process also requires that the defendant have the opportunity to challenge information in letters from victims not included in the victim-impact report.[323]  Under the federal rules, as well, the defense has a right to comment upon the presentence report.[324]


[321] United States v. Curran, 926 F.2d 59 (1st Cir. 1991) (due process violation found where numerous letters from victims to the court were not contained in the presentence report or disclosed to the defendant or defense counsel).

[322] United States v. Perri, 513 F.2d 572, 575 (9th Cir. 1975); United States v. Rosner, 485 F.2d 1213, 1229-30 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 950 (1974); United States v. Robin, 545 F.2d 775 (2d Cir. 1976); cf. Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349 (1977) (unconstitutional to impose death sentence on basis of materials in secret pre-sentence report — reasoning supports disclosure in noncapital cases as well); but see Burns v. United States, 501 U.S. 129, 138 (1991) (refusing to address whether due process requires that a court notify parties of its intention to sua sponte depart upward from the sentencing guidelines, instead relying on a technical violation of Rule 32).

[323] United States v. Curran, 926 F.2d 59 (1st Cir. 1991).

[324] F. R. Crim. Pro. 32(c)(1), (c)(3)(C).

 

TRANSLATE