Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants



 
 

§ 7.95 (A)

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

 

(A)  Exercise of Right to Trial.  The court may not sentence a defendant more harshly who demands a trial than one who pleads guilty.[283]


[283] United States v. Barris, 46 F.3d 33 (8th Cir. 1995) (court may not disqualify defendant from acceptance of responsibility reduction on ground defendant elected trial on an insanity defense); Scott v. United States, 419 F.2d 264, 269 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Thomas v. United States, 368 F.2d 941, 944 (5th Cir. 1966) (persistence in claim of innocence despite court’s request he make a clean breast of it and judge would take that into account in sentencing, although new trial, appeal, petition for certiorari, and collateral attack were still open to the defendant); ABA Standards Relating to Pleas of Guilty § 14-4 1.8 (1980) (“The court should not impose upon a defendant any sentence in excess of that which would be justified by any of the protective, deterrent, or other purposes of the criminal law because the defendant has chosen to require the prosecution to prove guilt at trial rather than to enter a plea of guilty or nolo contendere.”).

 

TRANSLATE