Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants



 
 

§ 7.116 (G)

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

(G)  Failure to grant downward departure on basis of harshness of deportation. [416]   A motion for downward departure was granted upon a demonstration that otherwise, the defendant would be subject to deportation to Mexico, and deportation would be extraordinarily harsh, because of the length of residence, large United States citizen family, and other equities.  The court found the resulting deportation would be a severe punishment not adequately accounted for in the Guidelines.  The defendant's minor role and lack of dangerousness were also factors supporting this decision.[417]  An order departing downward to render the defendant eligible for political asylum was reversed on the basis that the departure usurped the Attorney General's discretion under the immigration laws and lacked legal authority as Congress had affirmatively addressed the interplay between the criminal sentence and its collateral consequences.[418]

 


[416] See United States v. Angel-Martinez, 988 F.Supp. 475, 483 (D.N.J. 1997) (holding deportable status “is unavailable as a basis for departure absent some unusual aspect of a particular case” but noting no Third Circuit authority).

[417] United States v. Ferreria, 239 F.Supp.2d 849 (E.D. Wisc. November 6, 2002).

[418] United States v. Aleskerova, 300 F.3d 286 (2d Cir. 2002).

 

TRANSLATE