Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants



 
 

§ 7.106 (B)

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

(B)  Improper Considerations.  A sentence may be legally invalid if it has been based on an improper consideration, such as the out-of-state residence of the defendant.[364]


[364] United States v. Diamond, 561 F.2d 4 (4th Cir. 1977) (prosecutor may not ask harsher sentence because defendant resides out of state).

Updates

 

Other

POST CON - GROUNDS - SENTENCE - JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT TO CONSIDER INAPPROPRIATE FACTORS AT SENTENCE
At sentencing, the court sometimes makes legal errors. In addition, the judge sometimes takes into account inappropriate considerations in imposing sentence, to which counsel must object or the error is normally waived. See People v. Scott, 9 Cal.4th 331, 353 n.16 (1995)(defense counsels failure to object to sentencing errors bars raising those errors on appeal except for errors considered jurisdictional). For example, it is judicial misconduct to make negative remarks about the defendant being on welfare and fathering children out of wedlock. People v. Bolton, 23 Cal.3d 208, 217 (1979). The court may not threaten to have the defendants castrated. United States v. Duhart, 496 F.2d 941 (9th Cir. 1974) (judge stated he could put defendant in same room with husbands of sex offense victims and possibly cut "something" out of the defendants body).

 

TRANSLATE