Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants



 
 

§ 7.97 (C)

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

(C)  Procedure.  Where a breach has been shown, the government bears the burden of persuasion to establish that defendant breached the plea bargain, and hearsay is inadmissible to prove this.[306]  The government may not, consistently with due process, unilaterally nullify a plea agreement.  It must instead establish, at a hearing, by a preponderance of the evidence (a) that the defendant breached the agreement, and (b) that the breach was sufficiently serious to warrant rescission of the contract.[307]  If a defendant claims a plea bargain has been violated, the court must grant a hearing on the question.[308]


[306] United States v. Verrusio, 803 F.2d 885 (7th Cir. 1986).

[307] United States v. Castaneda, 162 F.3d 832 (5th Cir. 1998).

[308] Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333, 96 S.Ct. 893, 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976); United States v. Frazier, 213 F.3d 409 (7th Cir. 2000); United States v. Ataya, 864 F.2d 1324 (7th Cir. 1988) (breach by defendant who failed to identify co-conspirator).

 

TRANSLATE