Aggravated Felonies



 
 

§ B.47 1. False Statements

 
Skip to § B.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

Updates

 

BIA

SUBMITTING FALSE CLAIM - FRAUD OFFENSE
Matter of Onyido, 22 I. & N. Dec. 552 (BIA Mar. 4, 1999) (en banc) (Indiana conviction of submitting a false claim with intent to defraud, in violation of section 35-43-5-4(10) of the Indiana Code, a Class D felony for which the respondent received the maximum penalty of 3 years confinement, arising from an unsuccessful scheme to obtain $15,000 from an insurance company, was a conviction of an "attempt" to commit a fraud in which the loss to the victim exceeded $10,000, which was an aggravated felony within the meaning of INA § 101(a)(43)(U), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(U), triggering deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2)(A)(iii)).

Third Circuit

FILING FALSE TAX RETURNS - TAX EVASION
Lee v. United States, 368 F.3d 218 (3d Cir. May 19, 2004) (federal conviction of filing false income tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1), is not an aggravated felony, as defined by INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(M)(i), for immigration purposes, as INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(ii), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(M)(ii) specifically covers tax evasion, but INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(ii), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(M)(i) does not, since to hold otherwise would render INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(ii), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(M)(ii) mere surplusage).

Lower Courts of Third Circuit

FALSE STATEMENT ON LOAN APPLICATION - FRAUD OFFENSE
Sharma v. Ashcroft, 158 F.Supp.2d 519, 521 (E.D.Pa. May 25, 2001) (federal conviction of making false statements on a loan application, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014, constitutes an "aggravated felony" as defined by 8 U.S .C. § 1101(a)(43)(M)(i), for immigration purposes).

Ninth Circuit

FALSE STATEMENT TO GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL - FRAUD OFFENSE
Li v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. Nov. 19, 2004) (federal conviction of making a false statement to a United States official, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, is divisible with respect to the fraud offense aggravated felony defined in INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(M)(i), since it does not require proof of any monetary loss and so does not automatically satisfy the element of this aggravated felony definition requiring a loss to the victim(s) in excess of $10,000, so the record of conviction must be examined to determine whether the conviction falls within the definition).
FALSE TAX RETURN - FRAUD OFFENSE
Abreu-Reyes v. INS, 292 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir. June 10, 2002) (federal conviction of subscribing to a false tax return, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1), constituted an aggravated felony as a fraud offense under INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(M)(i) for removal purposes), opinion withdrawn on grant of rehearing by, 350 F.3d 966 (9th Cir. Nov. 21, 2003).

Lower Courts of Ninth Circuit

WELFARE FRAUD - FRAUD OFFENSE
Danh v. Demore, 59 F.Supp.2d 994 (N.D.Cal. May 28, 1999) (California conviction of welfare fraud, in violation of California Welf. & Inst.Code § 10980(c)(2), constituted an aggravated felony under INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(M)(i), as "fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $10,000").

 

TRANSLATE