Safe Havens



 
 

§ 7.107 (C)

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

(C)  Misprision of a Felony.  The common-law crime of misprision of a felony has been held not to be a crime of moral turpitude.[944]  Two circuit courts, and the BIA, in an unpublished decision, have held that the federal crime of misprision of a felony is a crime of moral turpitude.[945]  In Itani v. Ashcroft,[946] the Eleventh Circuit “conclude[d] that misprision of a felony is a crime of moral turpitude because it necessarily involves an affirmative act of concealment or participation in a felony, behavior that runs contrary to accepted societal duties and involves dishonest or fraudulent activity.”  This statement is inaccurate.  Misprision of a felony does not necessarily involve any dishonest or fraudulent activity.  For example, opening a door to allow a fleeing felon sanctuary would constitute misprision, but is not dishonest or fraudulent activity.  The sanctuary movement’s very public support for some who committed offenses for political reasons is another example.  Moreover, many underlying felonies are not dishonest, or fraudulent, and do not involve moral turpitude.  Aiding a felon who is not guilty of a CMT should not be held to involve moral turpitude, any more than conspiracy to commit a non-CMT is held to be a CMT.  See § 7.120, infra.

 

Misprision of a felony also does not constitute a crime relating to a controlled substance.[947]


[944] Matter of SC, 3 I. & N. Dec. 350 (BIA 1949).

[945] Smalley v. Ashcroft, 354 F.3d 332 (5th Cir. Dec. 15, 2003) (in dictum; Fifth Circuit [mis]cited Matter of Sloane, 12 I. & N. Dec. 840 (harboring a convicted murderer), as holding misprision of a felony was a CMT); Itani v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 1213 (11th Cir. April 22, 2002) (conviction for misprision of a felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4, constitutes a crime of moral turpitude for purposes of triggering deportation); Matter of Giraldo-Valencia, A36 520 954 (unpubl. BIA Index Dec., Oct. 22, 1992) (making a weak distinction between the crime of common law misprision that the BIA in Matter of SC held did not involve moral turpitude and statutory misprision under 18 U.S.C. § 4).

[946] Itani v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 1213, 1216 (11th Cir. April 22, 2002).

[947] Matter of Velasco, 16 I. & N. Dec. 281 (BIA 1977).

 

TRANSLATE