Safe Havens



 
 

§ 7.158 (C)

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

(C)  Safe Havens.  A court finding or conviction for violating a domestic violence protective order is subject to divisible statute analysis.  That is, such a finding is not a sufficient basis on which to find deportability, if the state statute providing for the protective order is broader than the deportation ground, and was therefore divisible when compared with the wording of the statute,[1200] so that it is possible for the state court to make a finding under the state statute, without the minimum conduct found true under the state court finding in fact falling within the federal deportation ground.[1201]

 

If such a finding is suffered, appealing the finding will arguably delay its finality and prevent the DHS from using it to begin deportation proceedings until the appeal is over.[1202] 

           


[1200] INA § 237(a)(2)(E)(ii), 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(ii).

[1201] Cf. Matter of Sweetser, 22 I. & N. Dec. 709 (BIA 1999).

[1202] K. BRADY, California Criminal Law And Immigration § § 2.1, 8.25 (2004).

 

TRANSLATE