Criminal Defense of Immigrants

(C)  Stipulation to Other Documents.  Where both parties in the criminal case agree that other documents form the factual basis for the plea, these additional documents can be properly considered by the immigration and federal courts in determining the nature of the offense of conviction.[168]

[168] E.g., United States v. Kiang, 175 F.Supp.2d 942, 950-951 (E.D.Mich. 2001) (“The sentencing transcript indicates that both parties concurred in the court’s proffer that it adopt the preliminary examination transcript (hereinafter “transcript”) by reference in order to establish a factual basis for the sentencing proceeding.”); United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez, 431 F.3d 1212 (9th Cir. Dec. 16, 2005) (California conviction of felony false imprisonment, in violation of Penal Code § 236, constitutes a divisible statute, encompassing some offenses that constitute crimes of violence within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii), and some that do not; if defendant was or might have been convicted of committing false imprisonment by fraud or deceit, the conviction would not fall within the crime of violence portion of the divisible statute, for purposes of assessing a 16-level increase in base offense level for illegal re-entry); Parrilla v. Gonzales, 414 F.3d 1038 (9th Cir. July 11, 2005) (where guilty plea agrees that certification for determination of probable cause will be reviewed by the court in determining whether there is a factual basis for the plea and in sentencing, the document is included within the record of conviction for purpose of enabling the immigration court to consider the facts recited within it in determining the elements of the offense to which the defendant engtered a guilty plea, in assessing the immigration consequences).