Aggravated Felonies



 
 

§ 2.6 C. Continuous Presence and the Stop-Time Rule

 
Skip to § 2.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

In order to be eligible for any form of cancellation of removal, except Special Rule Cancellation,[51] a noncitizen must show[52] that s/he has been continuously present in the United States for a specified period of time[53] prior to the date of commission of the offense or prior to the date of service of an NTA or OSC,[54] whichever comes first.[55]

 


[51] See § 2.23, infra; 8 C.F.R. § 240.64(b).

[52] See, e.g., Santana-Albarran v. Ashcroft, 393 F.3d 699 (6th Cir. Jan. 10, 2005) (noncitizen failed to establish that he had been physically present in the U.S. for a continuous 10-year period).

[53] For purposes of cancellation of removal residence requirement, a 10-year period that starts on January 1, 2000, ends on December 31, 2010.  Lagandaon v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 983 (9th Cir. Sept. 9, 2004).

[54] The service of an Order to Show Cause (used to initiate proceedings prior to April 1, 1997) also stops the clock.  Matter of Mendoza-Sandino, 22 I. & N. Dec. 1263 (BIA 2000).  However, service of an NTA or OSC does not stop the clock if that document is in relation to a separate, prior immigration proceeding. Matter of Cisneros-Gonzalez, 23 I. & N. Dec. 668 (BIA 2004) (non-LPR eligible for cancellation where 10 years had passed since illegal re-entry following deportation). 

[55] INA § 240A(d)(1), 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(1).

 

TRANSLATE