Criminal Defense of Immigrants

Chapter

§20.1 I. Summary for Criminal Defense Attorneys
§20.2 II. General Definition
§20.3 A. Intent Requirement
§20.4 1. Intent to Commit Certain Acts
§20.5 a. Intent to Steal
§20.6 b. Fraudulent Intent
§20.7 c. Intent to Inflict Bodily Harm
§20.8 d. Lewd Intent
§20.9 2. Varieties of Criminal Intent
§20.10 a. Strict Liability (i.e., No Criminal Intent)
§20.11 b. General Intent (to Commit an Act)
§20.12 c. Intent to Break the Law
§20.13 d. Negligence
§20.14 e. Gross Negligence
§20.15 f. Recklessness
§20.16 g. Malice
§20.17 h. Willfulness or Knowledge
§20.18 3. Differing Definitions of Intent
§20.19 B. Requirement of "Crime"
§20.20 C. Gravity of Offense or Sentence
§20.21 D. Significance of U.S. Contemporary Standards
§20.22 E. Regulatory Offenses
§20.23 F. Target Offenses
§20.24 G. Non-Substantive Offenses
§20.25 III. Inadmissibility Resulting from 1 CMT Conviction or Admission
§20.26 A. Elements of the Inadmissibility Ground
§20.27 1. Conviction
§20.28 2. Admission
§20.29 B. The Petty Offense Exception
§20.30 C. The Youthful Offender Exception
§20.31 D. The Political Offense Exception
§20.32 IV. Deportation Resulting from 1 Conviction
§20.33 A. Elements of Ground of Deportation
§20.34 B. Sentence Requirement
§20.35 1. Maximum Sentence of 1 Year
§20.36 2. Former Sentence Requirement
§20.37 C. Date of Commission
§20.38 V. Deportability Resulting From 2 or More CMT Convictions
§20.39 A. Elements of the Deportation Ground
§20.40 B. Single Scheme Exception
§20.41 C. Effect of Previous Grant of Relief
§20.42 VI. Immigration Consequences of Crimes of Moral Turpitude
§20.43 A. General Immigration Consequences
§20.44 B. Eligibility for Relief
§20.45 C. Relationship to Other Grounds of Removal
§20.46 D. Post-Conviction Relief

§ 20.24 (D)

For more text, click "Next Page>"

(D) Conspiracy. Generally speaking, conspiracy to commit a CMT has been held to be a CMT.[161] See N. Tooby, J. Rollin & J. Foster, Crimes of Moral Turpitude § 9.82 (2005).

[161] For discussion of conspiracy as an independent crime, see Callanan v. United States, 364 U.S. 587 (1961); Matter of A, 1 I. & N. Dec. 571 (BIA 1943) (conspiracy to violate § 593, Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1593, with intent to defraud the revenue of the United States is a crime involving moral turpitude).