Gill v. INS, __ F.3d __, 2005 WL 1983700 (2nd Cir. Aug. 18, 2005) (attempted reckless assault in violation of New York Penal Code 120.5(4) is not a crime involving moral turpitude because no discernable mental element in present since it is impossible to "attempt" to commit an act "recklessly" under New York law).

Matter of Muceros, Index Decision (BIA 2000) (Battery, in violation of California Penal Code section 243(d) is not a crime of moral turpitude for immigration purposes).
http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/indexnet00/muceros.pdf

Sosa-Martinez v. U.S. Atty. Gen., __ F.3d __ (11th Cir. Aug. 22, 2005) (aggravated battery, in violation of Fla. Stat. Ann. 784.045, is a conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude for immigration purposes).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0510066p.pdf

Rodriguez-Castro v. Gonzales, ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. Oct. 3, 2005) (attempted misdemeanor child abandonment, with intent to return to the child, under Texas Penal Code 22.041(b) is not a crime of moral turpitude because the offense may be committed without he actor knowing s/he thereby places the child at risk, and only involved negligent intent).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/5th/0460003cv0p.pdf

"Food Stamp Fraud," despite what its name sounds like, may be neither an Aggravated Felony nor a Crime of Moral Turpitude.  In some jurisdictions, the elements of the offense do not include any of the key elements that define common law fraud; instead, the offense is basically a strict-liability regulatory offense.

Under 408(a)(7) of the Social Security Act, a person is subject to criminal penalties if he or she: (1) willfully, knowingly, and with an intent to deceive uses a social security number on the basis of false information furnished to the SSA (408 (a)(7)(A));  (2) falsely represents, with an intent to deceive, a number to be the social security number assigned to him or her or to another person (408(a)(7)(B )); or  (3) knowingly altered a social security card issued by the SSA, bought or sold a card that was, or was purported to be, a card so issued, counterfeited a social secur

The offense of misuse of a social security number, in violation of 42 U.S.C. 408(a)(7)(B), may or may not be considered a crime of moral turpitude. For example, use of the card to open a checking account would not appear to be fraudulent, and thus not a CMT. The statute should therefore be considered divisible. Sale of fraudulent immigration documents is clearly CMT. Matter of Flores, 17 I. & N. Dec. 225, 1980 WL 121870 (BIA 1980). Use or possession of a false social security document with specific intent to defraud is a CMT. Matter of Serna, 20 I. & N. Dec. 579, 581 (BIA 1992).

Abdelqadar v. Gonzales, ___ F.3d ___, 2005 WL 1540245 (7th Cir. July 1, 2005) (Illinois conviction of illegally purchasing food stamps, in violation of 720 ILCS 5/17B-5, was a crime involving moral turpitude, for purposes of triggering deportation, since it was a species of fraud, and because crimes of deceit are the classic exemplars of moral turpitude), see Jordan v. DeGeorge, 341 U.S. 223 (1951).

Carty v. Ashcroft, ___ F.3d ___, 2005 WL 95730 (9th Cir. January 19, 2005) (California conviction of willful failure to file a tax return with the intent to evade taxes, in violation of Revenue and Taxation Code 19406 (1992), involves fraud, and thus constitutes a crime of moral turpitude for deportation purposes under INA 237(a)(2)(A)(ii), 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(A)(ii)).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0371392p.pdf

Vuksanovic v. U.S. Attorney Gen., ___ F.3d ___, 2006 WL 358659 (11th Cir. Feb. 17, 2006) (per curiam) (Florida conviction of second-degree arson, under Florida Statutes 806.01(2) [willful destruction of a structure by fire or explosion without a lawful, legitimate purpose], is a CMT rendering a noncitizen inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)(A), thereby depriving the court of appeal of jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(2)(C) to review a final order of removal); Rodriguez-Herrera v. INS, 52 F.3d 238, 239 n. 2 (9th Cir.