USCIS memo on new sex-registration ground of deportation at:
http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/handbook/AdamWalshAct072806.pdf

Lee v. United States, 368
F.3d 218 (3d Cir. May 19, 2004) (federal conviction of filing
false income tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1),
is not an aggravated felony, as defined by INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i),
8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(M)(i), for immigration purposes, as
INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(ii), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(M)(ii) specifically
covers tax evasion, but INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(ii), 8 U.S.C.

Sharma v. Ashcroft,
158 F.Supp.2d 519, 521 (E.D.Pa. May 25, 2001) (federal conviction
of making false statements on a loan application, in violation
of 18 U.S.C. § 1014, constitutes an "aggravated felony"
as defined by 8 U.S .C. § 1101(a)(43)(M)(i), for immigration
purposes).

Li v. Ashcroft,
389 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. Nov. 19, 2004) (federal conviction
of making a false statement to a United States official, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, is divisible with respect to
the fraud offense aggravated felony defined in INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i),
8 U.S.C.

Abreu-Reyes v. INS, 292 F.3d 1029
(9th Cir. June 10, 2002) (federal conviction of subscribing
to a false tax return, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1),
constituted an aggravated felony as a fraud offense under
INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(M)(i) for removal
purposes), opinion withdrawn on grant of rehearing by, 350
F.3d 966 (9th Cir. Nov. 21, 2003).

Danh v. Demore, 59 F.Supp.2d 994 (N.D.Cal.
May 28, 1999) (California conviction of welfare fraud, in
violation of California Welf. & Inst.Code § 10980(c)(2),
constituted an aggravated felony under INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i),
8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(M)(i), as "fraud or deceit in
which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $10,000").

Matter of Onyido, 22 I. &
N. Dec. 552 (BIA Mar.

United States v. Johnstone, 251 F.3d 281 (1st Cir. June 5,
2001) (Colorado conviction for forgery, on which a one-year
sentence was imposed, constituted an aggravated felony under
INA § 101(a)(43)(R), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(R), warranting
sentence enhancement for illegal re-entry under U.S.S.G. §
2L1.2(b)(1)(A)).

Richards v. Ashcroft, 400 F.3d
125 (2d Cir. Mar. 3, 2005) (Connecticut conviction of possession
of a forged document with intent to defraud, deceive, or injure,
in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-139, is "an offense
relating to . . . forgery" within the meaning of INA
§ 101(a)(43)(R), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(R), and is therefore
an aggravated felony for deportation purposes under INA §
237(a)(2)(A)(iii), 8 U.S.C.

Drakes v. Zimski, 240 F.3d 246 (3d Cir. Feb. 20, 2001) (Delaware
conviction for forgery in violation of 11 Del.C. § 861, with
one-year sentence imposed, was "aggravated felony,"
under INA § 101(a)(43)(R), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(R), causing
Court of Appeals to lose jurisdiction to consider petition
for review of deportation order).