United States v. Nason, 269 F.3d 10,
20 (1st Cir. Oct. 19, 2001) (Maine conviction for assault,
under 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207 qualifies as a "crime of violence"
for purposes of 18 U.S.C.

Choeum v. INS, 129 F.3d 29 (1st Cir.
Nov. 5, 1997) (New York conviction of kidnapping was crime
of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a), since it had force as
an element, and therefore constituted an "aggravated
felony " under INA § 101(a)(43)(F), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(F)
for immigration purposes).

Sango-Dema v. District
Director, INS, 122 F.Supp.2d 213 (D.Mass. Nov. 20, 2000) (Massachusetts
conviction for indecent assault and battery on a person over
fourteen years old, in violation of Mass. Gen. L. ch. 265,
§ 13H, with sentence of three to five years suspended sentence,
constitutes a "crime of violence," an aggravated
felony under 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) and INA 101(43)(F), 8 U.S.C.

Solorzano-Patlan v. INS, 207 F.3d 869 (7th Cir. Mar.
10, 2000) (Illinois conviction of "burglary" of
automobile, in violation of 720 ILCS § 5/19-1(a), was not
an aggravated felony "burglary offense" under INA
§ 101(a)(43)(G), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(G) that would trigger
deportation).

United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 393
F.3d 849 (9th Cir. Jan.

Ye v. INS, 214 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. June 9, 2000) (California
conviction of vehicle burglary in violation of California
Penal Code § 459 did not constitute "burglary" within
the federal aggravated felony definition, INA § 101(a)(43)(G),
8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G), nor "crime of violence"
within INA § 101(a)(43)(F), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(F), for
immigration purposes).

United States v. Parker, 5 F.3d 1322, 1325
(9th Cir. Sept. 28, 1993) (California Information charging
burglary did not satisfy Taylor because of failure to allege
"unlawful or unprivileged" entry).

Matter of Perez, 22 I. & N. Dec. 1325 (BIA June
6, 2000) (en banc) (Texas conviction of burglary of a vehicle,
in violation of Texas Penal Code § 30.04(a), is not an aggravated
felony "burglary offense" within the definition
of INA § 101(a)(43)(G), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(G))

United States v. Anderson, 989 F.2d 310 (9th Cir.
1993) (Washington: outlining generic definition of extortion
by reference to 18 U.S.C. § 1951 federal definition for purposes
of career offender sentencing enhancement).

Conteh v. Gonzales, __ F.3d __ (1st Cir. Aug.
22, 2006) (Federal conviction for conspiracy under 18 U.S.C.
§ 371, where the underlying offense was a violation of
18 U.S.C. § 1344 [bank fraud] with a loss in excess of
$10,000, is an aggravated felony fraud offense for immigration
purposes).