MOTION TO REOPEN - NEW EVIDENCE MUST BE SHOWN NOT ONLY TO BE MATERIAL BUT UNAVAILABLE AND UNDISCOVERABLE PRIOR TO CONCLUSION OF REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
Ivanov v. Gonzales, ___ F.3d ___ (8th Cir. April 24, 2007) (IJ abused discretion by granting DHS motion to reopen pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 1003.23(b)(3) because DHS failed to establish that the evidence submitted with its motion to reopen was not only material, but was also unavailable and undiscoverable prior to the conclusion of removal proceedings).
RELIEF - REINSTATEMENT OF REMOVAL ORDER - REINSTATEMENT STATUTE DOES NOT APPLY RETROACTIVELY TO NONCITIZEN WHO WAS EXCLUDED, REENTERED, MARRIED U.S. CITIZEN, AND GRANTED ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS BEFORE EFFECTIVE DATE OF IIRAIRA
Valdez-Sanchez v. Gonzales, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. April 23, 2007) (after noncitizen had been ordered excluded, reentered, married a U.S. citizen, and was granted an adjustment of status prior to the effective date of IIRAIRA, DHS may not retroactively apply INA 241(a)(5) to reinstate a previous removal order).
AGGRAVATED FELONY - CRIME OF VIOLENCE - KIDNAPPING
United States v. Iniguez-Barba, ___ F.3d ___, 2007 WL 1207046 (5th Cir. April 25, 2007) (per curiam) (New York conviction for kidnapping in the second degree, in violation of New York Penal Law 135.20, was a "crime of violence" under U.S.S.G. 2L1.2. for purposes of 16-level enhancement of illegal reentry sentence, even though the statute does not require the kidnapping be conducted with a specific intent), following United States v. Gonzalez-Ramirez, 477 F.3d 310, 317 (5th Cir. 2007) (Tennessee conviction of "kidnapping" was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G.
AGGRAVATED FELONY - KIDNAPPING
United States v. Iniguez-Barba, ___ F.3d ___, 2007 WL 1207046 (5th Cir. April 25, 2007) (per curiam) (finding violation of a statute requiring as elements: (1) knowing removal or confinement; (2) substantial interference with the victim's liberty; and (3) force, threat, or fraud, or, if the victim is incompetent or under age thirteen, lack of consent from the person responsible for the general supervision of the victim's welfare, to be sufficient to qualify as "kidnapping" for purposes of meeting the "crime of violence" definition under U.S.S.G.
AGGRAVATED FELONY - KIDNAPPING - FALSE IMPRISONMENT
United States v. Iniguez-Barba, ___ F.3d ___, 485 F.3d 790 (5th Cir. April 25, 2007) (per curiam) (finding violation of a statute requiring as elements: (1) knowing removal or confinement; (2) substantial interference with the victim's liberty; and (3) force, threat, or fraud, or, if the victim is incompetent or under age thirteen, lack of consent from the person responsible for the general supervision of the victim's welfare, to be sufficient to qualify as "kidnapping" for purposes of meeting the "crime of violence" definition under U.S.S.G.
DIVISIBLE STATUTE ANALYSIS - STATE LABEL
United States v. Iniguez-Barba, ___ F.3d ___, 485 F.3d 790 (5th Cir. April 25, 2007) (per curiam) ("While we don't look only to the label of the statute at issue to determine what exactly it proscribes, see Fierro-Reyna, 466 F.3d at 326-27, of course we must look to the labels of the statutes to which we compare the statute at issue.")
AGGRAVATED FELONY - BURGLARY - FLORIDA BURGLARY NOT AN AGGRAVATED FELONY
United States v. Gomez-Guerra, 485 F.3d 301 (5th Cir. April 23, 2007) (Florida conviction for burglary, in violation of Florida Statute 810.02(3) (1995), which forbids not only entry into a structure but also entry into its curtilage, where the charge was in accord, including the words "or the curtilage," did not constitute a crime of violence, pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) (2005), as an enumerated offense ( "burglary of a dwelling" under USSG 2L1.2 cmt.
AGGRAVATED FELONY - BURGLARY - DISTINCTION BETWEEN ARMED CAREER CRIMINAL ACT AND ILLEGAL REENTRY SENTENCE ENHANCEMENT
James v. United States, 550 U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 1586 (April 18, 2007) (Florida conviction for attempted burglary of a dwelling qualifies as a violent felony for the purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C 924(2)(B)(ii), under the residual provision in 18 U.S.C. 924(2)(B)(ii), as an offense that "otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.")
RELIEF - ASYLUM - FRIVOLOUSNESS - REQUIRED FINDINGS
Matter of YL, 24 I. & N. Dec.
AGGRAVATED FELONIES - DRUG TRAFFICKING - POSSESSION - SECOND POSSESSION
For those litigating challenges to drug aggravated felony charges post-Lopez, the NYSDA Immigrant Defense Project has updated its "Practice Advisory: Removal Defense of Immigrants in Drug Possession Cases - The Impact of Lopez v. Gonzales." http://www.nysda.org/idp/docs/07_PostLopezAdvisoryforRemovalDefense41207.... Also available on the IDP website are copies of amicus briefs addressing post-Lopez issues filed before the Board of Immigration Appeals and before the Second, Fifth, and Eleventh Circuits. http://www.nysda.org/idp/webPages/drugLitigationInit.htm
Thanks to Manny Vargas.