Tooby's California Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants
§ 4.54 (B)
For more text, click "Next Page>"
(B)
Malpractice Liability. Malpractice liability is not a realistic possibility, unless the client was actually innocent of all wrongdoing.[168] In addition, any statements original counsel makes in a declaration intended to reduce the damage to the client from counsel's actions are inadmissible in any malpractice action against counsel.[169] As the court stated, "[A]n attorney should be able to admit a mistake without subjecting himself [or herself] to a malpractice suit (Id., 118 Cal.Rptr. at 631.).”
[168] Lynch v. Warwick (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 267, 115 Cal. Rptr. 391 (plaintiff suing attorney for malpractice must prove actual [innocence of the crime, even if he is not suing for damages but only to get fees returned); see Coscia v. McKenna & Cuneo (2001) 25 Cal.4th 1194; Barner v. Lees (2000) 24 Cal.4th 676).
[169] Smith v. Lewis (1975) 13 Cal.3d 349, 118 Cal.Rptr. 621, disapproved on other grounds in Marriage of Brown (1976) 15 Cal.3d 838, 851 n.14, 126 Cal.Rptr. 633.