JUDICIAL REVIEW - JURISDICTION LIMITATION - DISCRETIONARY DECISIONS - REVOCATION OF NIV VISA

Jilin Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Chertoff, 447 F.3d 196 (3d Cir. May 10, 2006) (decision by the attorney general under 8 U.S.C. 1155 to revoke a prior approval of a visa petition was an act of administrative discretion that was statutorily shielded from court review, even as to constitutional claims).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/3rd/052788p.pdf

jurisdiction: 
Third Circuit

ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS - MISTAKE BY DHS

Savoury v. United States Atty Gen., 449 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. May 25, 2006) (noncitizen who was inadmissible at time of adjustment of status, but was allowed to adjust status by mistake, is not a noncitizen lawfully admitted to the United States for purposes of demonstrating eligibility for relief under former INA 212(c)). http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0510966p.pdf

jurisdiction: 
Eleventh Circuit

RELIEF - ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS - ARRIVING ALIENS - VALIDITY OF REGULATION PRECLUDING ADJUSTMENT

Akhtar v. Gonzales, 450 F.3d 587 (5th Cir. May 23, 2006) (regulation precluding applications for adjustment of status from "paroled" "arriving aliens" in removal proceedings, 8 C.F.R. 245.1(c)(8) (1997), is not ultra vires to statute).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/5th/0460497cv0p.pdf

jurisdiction: 
Fifth Circuit

RELIEF - ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS - REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS - APPLICANT FOR ADJUSTMENT UNDER CHINESE STUDENT PROTECTION ACT CANNOT TRANSFER APPLICATION TO ALLOW ADJUSTMENT UNDER INA 245(i)

Matter of Wang, 23 I. & N. Dec. 924 (BIA May 25, 2006) (noncitizen whose adjustment application under the Chinese Student Protection Act was filed prior to the October 1, 1994 start of INA 245(i) application processing may not transfer the CSPA application into a INA 245(i) application). http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol23/3533.pdf

jurisdiction: 
BIA

RELIEF - ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS - CHINESE STUDENT PROTECTION ACT - PERSON WHO ENTERED WITHOUT INSPECTION DISQUALIFIED FROM ADJUSTMENT UNDER CSPA

Matter of Wang, 23 I. & N. Dec. 924 (BIA May 25, 2006) (noncitizen who entered the United States without inspection is not eligible for adjustment of status under the Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992, Pub. L. No. 102-404, 106 Stat. 1969).

jurisdiction: 
BIA

RELIEF - ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS - ARRIVING ALIEN - REGULATION PRECLUDING ADJUSTMENT FOR ARRIVING ALIENS HELD INVALID

Scheerer v. United States Atty Gen., 445 F.3d 1311 (11th Cir. Apr. 13, 2006) (8 C.F.R. 1245.1(c)(8), which prohibits petitioner from applying for change of status as an arriving alien in removal proceedings, is ultra vires to INA 245(a), and therefore invalid).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0416231p.pdf

jurisdiction: 
Eleventh Circuit

ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS - VISA WAIVER PROGRAM

Freeman v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. Apr. 21, 2006) (Bar to review of denial of benefits for those who entered United States via Visa Waiver Program does not apply to noncitizen who has filed an adjustment of status application as an immediate relative).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0435797p.pdf

jurisdiction: 
Ninth Circuit

RELIEF - ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS - ARRIVING ALIEN - REGULATION PRECLUDING ADJUSTMENT FOR ARRIVING ALIENS IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS HELD INVALID

Momin v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 447 (5th Cir. Apr. 25, 2005) (8 C.F.R. section 245.1(c)(8), which deems arriving aliens who are in removal proceedings ineligible to apply for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident, is not ultra vires to INA 245).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/5th/0560119cv0p.pdf

jurisdiction: 
Fifth Circuit

ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS - CANNOT ADJUST TWICE ON SAME PETITION

Matter of Villareal-Zuniga, 23 I. & N. Dec. 886 (BIA 2006) (an application for adjustment of status cannot be based on an approved visa petition that has already been used by the beneficiary to obtain adjustment or admission as an immigrant).
http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol23/3527.pdf

jurisdiction: 
BIA

RELIEF - ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS

Pede v. Gonzales, 442 F.3d 570 (7th Cir. Mar. 24, 2006) (immigration judge is not required to continue proceedings to allow the USICE to process an adjustment application where the respondent is clearly not statutorily eligible to adjust).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/7th/051897p.pdf

jurisdiction: 
Seventh Circuit

 

TRANSLATE