People v. Almanza, ___ Cal.App.4th ___, ___, ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___, 2015 WL 368283 (6th Dist. Jan. 29, 2015) (Because defense counsel was not representing two or more defendants concurrently, under Doolins bright-line rule we apply the traditional Strickland prejudice standard to his claim. . . . Accordingly, it is possible that the outcome might have differed absent the conflict of interest. But Strickland speaks not of possibilities, but reasonable probabilities. Jane's inculpatory statements are buttressed by defendant's own inculpating statement and behavior. There is no reasonable probability of a different outcome.).
Cal Crim Def 20.39