Coronado v. Holder, ___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 983621 (9th Cir. Mar. 14, 2014) (Health & S C 11377(a) is not categorically a conviction relating to a federally-listed controlled substance, for purposes of inadmissibility, because it includes at least one substance that is not on the federal list).

NOTE: The court found that Health & Safety Code punishes offenses involving "khat (Catha Edulis) and Chorionic gonadotropin (HGC), which are not listed in the federal schedules. See 21 C.F.R. 1308.13 (Schedule III of the CSA).
CD4:19.60, 21.34;AF:5.42, A:18, B.4;SH:7.69, 8.5, 7.143

CAL POST CON " VEHICLES " PIECEMEAL LITIGATION
People v. Medina, 2011 WL 766949 (6th Dist. Mar. 4, 2011) (unpublished) (rule against piecemeal litigation does not bar a defendant from pursuing a motion to vacate under Penal Code 1016.5, after first unsuccessfully filing a petition for a writ of error coram nobis, because unlike Kim, here defendant did not file two nonstatutory motions to vacate on the same grounds; he filed different motions on different grounds); distinguishing People v. Kim, (2009) 45 Cal.4th 1078, 90 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, 373-374 (for relief on habeas corpus, it has long been the rule that piecemeal presentation of known claims is prohibited.); following People v. Totari (2002) 28 Cal.4th 876, 886-887.