United States v. Urias-Marrufo, 744 F.3d 361, 369 (5th Cir. Feb. 28, 2014) (It is counsel's duty, not the court's, to warn of certain immigration consequences, and counsel's failure cannot be saved by a plea colloquy. Thus, it is irrelevant that the magistrate judge asked Urias whether she understood that there might be immigration consequences and that she and her attorney had discussed the possible adverse immigration consequences of pleading guilty.); citing Marroquin v. United States, 480 Fed.Appx. 294, 299 (5th Cir. 2012) (Dennis, J., concurring) ([T]he judicial plea colloquy is no remedy for counsel's deficient performance in fulfilling these obligations.).