United States v. Urias-Marrufo, 744 F.3d 361, 369 (5th Cir. Feb. 28, 2014) (district court commits reversible error by failing to consider Padilla claim as a ground in support of a motion to withdraw a plea before imposition of sentence: We hold that when a Padilla claim is sufficiently presented during a motion to withdraw a plea, both legally and factually, a district court errs in failing to address the claim. Moreover, if the court finds that a Padilla violation occurred, that finding compels the court to permit the defendant to withdraw the guilty plea.).