Under certain limited circumstances, the immigration judge must grant a motion to suppress evidence of the noncitizens identity in removal proceedings. See Lopez-Rodriguez v. Mukasey, 536 F.3d 1012, 1015"16 (9th Cir. Aug. 8, 2008) (the exclusionary rule applies in immigration court only to evidence seized in connection with a Fourth Amendment violation that is an egregious one in which a government agent deliberately committed the violation or did so by conduct a reasonable officer should have known would violate the Constitution); Orhorhaghe v. INS, 38 F.3d 488, 497 (9th Cir. 1994) (quoting Benitez-Mendez v. INS, 760 F.2d 907, 909 (9th Cir. 1983) (before taking an individual into custody, an immigration officer must be able to articulate objective facts providing a reasonable suspicion that the subject of the seizure was an alien illegally in this country.) (internal brackets omitted)); see also 8 C.F.R. 287.8(c)(2)(i) (2013) (requiring immigration officers to have a reason to believe that the person to be arrested . . . is an alien illegally in the United States.).