United States v. Xu, 706 F.3d 965, 2013 WL 28392 (9th Cir. Jan. 3, 2013) (the sentences are vacated, and the cases are remanded for resentencing and reconsideration regarding the legal and factual basis for the $482 million restitution order, where the count one convictions are not the result of an improper extraterritorial application of the RICO conspiracy statute because defendants' criminal enterprise involved both bank fraud and immigration fraud centered on stealing money from the Bank of China and traveling freely with that stolen money in the United States; but the district court improperly relied on defendants' foreign conduct to meet requirements in sentencing, and failed to provide an adequate legal and factual basis for the $482 million restitution order).