Crosby v. Schwartz, 678 F.3d 784 (9th Cir. May 4, 2012) (affirming denial of habeas corpus, where state court holdings were neither contrary to, nor involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, in that the defendants jury trial waiver was express and intelligent; there is no clearly established U.S. Supreme Court law that holds that the Constitution guarantees a right to a jury trial after a valid waiver of that right).