Pilla v. United States, 668 F.3d 368, 373 (6th Cir. Feb. 6, 2012) (defendant was not prejudiced by counsel's inaccurate immigration advice because she faced overwhelming evidence of guilt, had no realistic chance of being acquitted at trial, and would have received a longer sentence plus the same deportation consequences: no rational defendant in Pilla's position would have proceeded to trial in this situation.); see United States v. Johnson, 237 F.3d 751, 755 (6th Cir. Jan. 25, 2001).