The Supreme Courts retroactivity analysis, in Teague v. Lane, does not apply in state court post-conviction proceedings. See Danforth v. Minnesota, 552 U.S. 264, 282, 128 S. Ct. 1029, 169 L. Ed. 2d 859 (2008) (stating that Teague "does not in any way limit the authority of a state court, when reviewing its own state criminal convictions, to provide a remedy for a violation that is declared 'nonretroactive' under Teague."); Denisyuk v. State, 30 A.3d 914 (2011);