People v. Arriaga, 201 Cal.App.4th 439, 133 Cal.Rptr.3d 807 (2d Dist. Dec. 1, 2011) (affirming trial courts denial of a motion to vacate the conviction under Penal Code 1016.5(a), where minute order stating that the defendant was advised of the possible effects of his plea on any alien/citizenship/probation/parole status. plus specific testimony of prosecutor that it was his habit and custom always to deliver a specific advisement that was sufficient under the statute constituted substantial evidence that the required advice was given sufficient to overcome the rebuttable presumption that it had not been given arising from the courts failure to keep a record that a sufficient advisal had been given); cf. People v. Dubon (2001) 90 Cal.App.4th 944, 955 (minute order stating that the defendant was advised of the possible effects of his plea on any alien / citizenship / probation / parole status. provides some evidence that the required [Penal Code 1016.5] advisements were given, [but] it is insufficient, without more, to establish a complete advisement of the three possible consequences: deportation, exclusion, and denial of naturalization).