United States v. Orocio, 645 F.3d 630, No. 10-1231, 2011 WL 2557232, at *7 (3d. Cir. June 29, 2011); Amer v. United States, No. 1:06CR118-GHD, 2011 WL 2160553, at *3 (N.D. Miss. May 31, 2011); United States v. Chavarria, Nos. 2:10-CV-191 JVB, 2:08- CR-192, 2011 WL 1336565, at *2-3 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 7, 2011); Marroquin v. United States, No. M-10-156, 2011 WL 488985, at *6 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 4, 2011); United States v. Zhong Lin, No. 3:07-CR-44-H, 2011 WL 197206, at *2-3 (W.D. Ky. Jan. 20, 2011); Luna v. United States, No. 10CV1659 JLS, 2010 WL 4868062, at *3-4 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2010); Martin v. United States, No. 09-1387, 2010 WL 3463949, at *3 (C.D. Ill. Aug. 25, 2010); United States v. Chaidez, 730 F. Supp. 2d 896, 904 (N.D. Ill. 2010); Al Kokabani v. United States, Nos. 5:06-CR-207-FL, 5:08-CV-177-FL, 2010 WL 3941836, at *6 (E.D.N.C. July 30, 2010); United States v. Hubenig, No. 6:03-mj-040, 2010 WL 2650625, at *8 (E.D. Cal. July 1, 2010); Commonwealth v. Clarke, 949 N.E.2d 892, 904, (Mass. 2011); People v. Bennett, 903 N.Y.S.2d 696, 700 (N.Y. Crim. Ct. 2010); Constanza v. State, unpublished, (Aug. 15, 2011) (Hennepin County District Court File No. 27-CR-09-45135) (Because we held in Campos v. State, 798 N.W.2d 565, 568-69 (Minn. App. 2011), review granted (Minn. July 19, 2011), that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S. Ct. 1473 (2010), applies retroactively to similarly situated post-conviction petitioners, we reverse and remand.); following Campos v. State, 798 N.W.2d 565, 568-69 (Minn. App. 2011), review granted (Minn. July 19, 2011).