Salazar v. State, 2011 WL 4584938 (Tex. App. Sept. 28, 2011) (defense counsel violated Padilla duty to advise client about certain deportation consequence, and this error was prejudicial, since it would have been rational for the defendant to have taken the case to trial if he had known about the immigration disaster, requiring reversal of the conviction: preserving the clients right to remain in the United States may be more important to the client than any potential jail sentence.).