In re Douglas, 200 Cal.App.4th 236, 132 Cal.Rptr.3d 582, 586 (4th Dist. Oct. 27, 2011) (Substantial delay is measured from the time the petitioner or his ... counsel knew, or reasonably should have known, of the information offered in support of the claim and the legal basis for the claim.); quoting In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780; citing In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 765, fn. 5; but see In re Crockett (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 751, 757"758 (habeas petition deemed timely because the legal claim was not apparent until new case law was published; thus, timeliness was not measured from 2001 (the time at which the petitioner became aware of the registration requirement), but from 2006 (when the new case law giving rise to the legal claim was published).