Doe v. Attorney General, 659 F.3d 266 (3d Cir. Sept. 8, 2011) (a lawful permanent resident entering the United States is presumed not to be seeking admission under INA 101(a)(13)(C)(v), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(13)(C)(v), unless the government establishes at the time of the entry probable cause to believe that the LPR has committed a listed offense: Where a warrant has issued for the alien's arrest on suspicion of the commission of one of the enumerated crimes, probable cause will be presumed. Where such a warrant has not issued, treatment of the arriving alien as an applicant for admission rather than as a permanent resident will be contingent on a judge's (or a magistrate's) assessment of the proffered basis for believing probable cause to exist. And, of course, if it becomes apparent at some later point that probable cause no longer exists, the government may no longer regard[ ] the lawful permanent resident as an applicant for admission.); cf. Cannon v. Macon Cnty., 1 F.3d 1558, 1563 (11th Cir. 1993) (holding that a detainee has a constitutional right to be released from confinement after it was or should have been known that [he] was entitled to release).