Stark v. Superior Court, 52 Cal.4th 368 (Aug. 1, 2011) (To this end, a violation of section 424 is committed by a public officer when he uses public funds in a manner forbidden by law even though he may have no fraudulent intent when he does so.... It is sufficient that he intentionally committed the forbidden act. . . . [There is] no basis for the claim that there must exist in the mind of the transgressor a specific purpose or intent to violate law.); quoting People v. Dillon (1926) 199 Cal. 1,7, 248 P. 230.

jurisdiction: 
Other

 

TRANSLATE