A federal conviction of Interstate Travel in Aid of Racketeering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1952(a)(3), would not constitute an aggravated felony drug trafficking conviction, or a controlled substances conviction, if was framed as "knowingly use telephone facility in interstate commerce, to carry on an unlawful activity, as defined in 1952(b), by storing currency that is the proceeds of such unlawful activity." Section 1952(b) is divisible in its definition of unlawful activity, and includes "any business enterprise involving gambling, liquor on which the Federal excise tax has not been paid, narcotics or controlled substances (as defined in section 102(6) of the Controlled Substances Act), or prostitution offenses in violation of the law of the State in which they are committed or of the United States . . . ." 18 U.S.C. 1952(b)(1). Some of these unlawful activities, particularly gambling and liquor tax violations, are harmless under federal immigration law. So long as the record of conviction does not identify the unlawful activity as controlled substances trafficking, this should be a safe haven for deportation purposes since the government bears the burden of proof. It is necessary to keep the factual admissions in the Plea Agreement from mentioning drugs; perhaps the specific reference to "currency which is the proceeds of an unlawful activity as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1952(b) would suffice as an admission in the Plea Agreement and plea colloquy. If so, the conviction should constitute a safe haven.