Camacho-Salinas v. U.S. Atty Gen., __ F.3d __ (11th Cir. Aug. 21, 2006) (INA 212(h) requirement that LPR have resided in the United States for seven years to become eligible does not violate equal protection, even those the residence requirement is not applied to non-LPRs), following Moore v. Ashcroft, 251 F.3d 919, 926 (11th Cir. 2001). See also, Taniguchi v. Schultz, 303 F.3d 950, 957-58 (9th Cir. 2002); Jankowski-Burczyk v. INS, 291 F.3d 172, 178 (2d Cir. 2002); Lukowski v. INS, 279 F.3d 644, 647 (8th Cir. 2002); De Leon-Reynoso v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 633, 640 (3d Cir. 2002); Lara-Ruiz v. INS, 241 F.3d 934, 947 (7th Cir. 2001).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0517126p.pdf