Arguelles-Olivares v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 171, 180 (5th Cir. April 22, 2008), revised opinion, (5th Cir. Feb. 2009) (rejecting privacy objection to use of federal presentence report to establish loss to victim over $10,000 for fraud offense aggravated felony, under INA 101(a)(43)(M)(i), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(M)(i): "[noncitizen] additionally asserts that the PSR is confidential and cannot be accessed without leave of court. Arguelles-Olivares made no attempt during the immigration proceedings to seek an injunction or order from the district court to maintain the confidentiality of the PSR. He did not identify any provisions of the PSR that would jeopardize his own privacy or the government's interest in maintaining the trust of third-party witnesses by keeping the PSR confidential. There was no abuse of discretion in admitting the PSR.").