"[I]f a defendant enters a guilty plea, the sentencing court may consider the charging documents in conjunction with the plea agreement, the transcript of a plea proceeding, or the judgment to determine whether the defendant pled guilty to the elements of the generic crime. Charging papers alone are never sufficient." United States v. Corona-Sanchez, 291 F.3d 1201, 1211 (9th Cir. 2002).      "It cannot be disputed that Count Ones language sets out the generic elements of burglary . The Information alone, however, cannot support a finding that Velasco-Medinas burglary conviction was an aggravated felony. By itself, the Information contained the elements of the crime the government set out to prove; it did not establish the elements to which Velasco-Medina actually admitted in his guilty plea." United States v. Velasco-Medina, 305 F.3d 839, 852 (9th Cir. 2002) (emphasis in original).      "[T]he record indicates that Belles was charged with conduct that was a violent act and not merely a rude or insolent touching. But the record does not reveal the conduct to which he pleaded and for which he was convicted. Accordingly we cannot conclude that the trier of fact in this case necessarily found Belless guilty of conduct that, under a modified categorical approach, serves as a predicate offense." United States v. Belless, 338 F.3d 1063, 1068, 1069 (9th Cir. 2003). Thanks to K Brady for this analysis.