A juvenile who admits the essential elements of a CMT is not thereby rendered inadmissible. In Matter of MU, 2 I. & N. Dec. 92 (BIA 1944), the Board held that a respondent who as an adult admitted to having committed a "theft" as a juvenile has not admitted the essential elements of a CMT because the conduct as a matter of law could constitute only juvenile delinquency. This reasoning also applies with full force to the issue of inadmissibility based on an admission of the essential elements of a controlled substance offense. The reasoning of Matter of MU might also apply to statements that arguably create a "reason to believe" that a noncitzen is a trafficker, since immigration counsel could argue that "illicit trafficker" means that the person must be guilty of a criminal offense relating to trafficking in a controlled substance, and juvenile delinquency is not a criminal offense.