United States v. Rodriguez-Alvarez, ___ F.3d ___, 2005 WL 2551096 (7th Cir. Oct. 12, 2005) (affirming illegal reentry sentence, holding non-deferential standard of review applied as to defendant's argument that district court's procedural errors had rendered sentence unreasonable; District Court was not required to go through each statutory sentencing factor, or every factor raised by defendant, and articulate what weight they were given; and District Court's failure to make specific fact findings as to defendant's mitigating factors did not preclude review).