Teaupa v. Gonzales, ___ F.3d ___, 2007 WL 580672 (9th Cir. Feb. 22, 2007) ("We requested additional briefing on the issue [whether respondent's admission, in pleading to the NTA, that a court had determined he had engaged in conduct that violated a portion of a DV protection order that involved protection against credible threats of violence, repeated harassment, or bodily injury to the person(s) for whom the protection order had been issued], and we now remand to the BIA to consider, in the first instance, whether Teaupas admission can be used to determine removability pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(E)(ii).").