United States v. Nobriga, ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. May 20, 2005) (per curiam) (Hawaii conviction of abuse of a family or household member, in violation of Haw. Rev. Stat. 709-906(A), did not constitute a conviction of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, under 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(33)(A)(ii), because neither the Hawaii statute standing alone nor the judicially noticeable facts establish that the victim of his Hawaii offense had the required domestic relationship to the defendant; the Hawaii statute is divisible with respect to this federal requirement because it allows conviction if the violence occurs between "persons jointly residing or formerly residing in the same dwelling unit" and therefore includes roommates who have no other, more personal relationship, whereas each of the federal categories of domestic violence, in contrast, specifies particular personal relationships between the victim and the defendant, so a conviction under this statute is not categorically a crime of domestic violence under the federal firearms statute).