United States v. Venegas-Onelas, 348 F.3d 1273 (10th Cir. November 14, 2003) ("Force, as used in the definition of a crime of violence, is synonymous with destructive or violent force. United States v. Landeros-Gonzales, 262 F.3d 424, 426 (5th Cir.2001) (quoting United States v. Rodriguez-Guzman, 56 F.3d 18, 20 n. 8 (5th Cir.1995); see also Lucio-Lucio, 2003 WL 22436260, at *2 (explaining that 16(b) calls to mind active violence) (quotation omitted); Bazan-Reyes v. INS, 256 F.3d 600, 611 (7th Cir.2001) ([W]e found the term 'physical force' in 18 U.S.C. 16(b) refers to actual violent force.)."; court recognized United States v. Chapa-Garza, 243 F.3d 921 (5th Cir.2001) distinction between offenses involving substantial risk that injury will result [not a crime of violence] and offenses where the defendant will intentionally employ force against the person or property of another in order to effectuate the commission of the offense [crime of violence], and the requirement that the risk of force involve intentional, rather than accidental, physical force)