Matter of J, 2 I. & N. Dec. 285 (BIA 1945) ("In deciding whether an alien has admitted the commission of a crime involving moral turpitude under sections 3 and 19 of the Immigration Act of 1917, the following rules are to be observed: (1) It must first be established that under the law where the act was alleged to have been committed that it is a crime. (2) An adequate definition of the crime, including all essential elements, must first be given to the alien. This must conform to the law of the jurisdiction where the offense is alleged to have been committed, and it must be explained in understandable terms. (3) The alien must then admit all the factual elements which constitute the crime. (In the Matter of P, Atty. Gen., 56107/465, March 7, 1941.) (4) The alien must thereafter admit the fact that he has committed the crime-in other words, the legal conclusion. Howes v. Tozer, 3 F.2d 849 (1st Cir 1925) (5) The admission by the alien of the crime must be explicit, unequivocal and unqualified. Howes v. Tozer, 3 F.2d 849 (1st Cir 1925). (6) It must also appear from the statute and statements of the alien that the crime which he has admitted committing involves moral turpitude. It is not necessary that the alien admit that the crime involves moral turpitude.") The statute does not mean admitting facts from which an inference of guilt may be drawn. Howes v. Tozer, 3 F.2d 849 (1st Cir 1925). In Matter of G- 1 I & N Dec. 225 (BIA 1942), the Board made it clear that the admission must be voluntary. It is not suppose to involve an interrogation on the part of the Service in an attempt to try the guilt of the Respondent. This exceeds their jurisdiction. These rules appear to have been adopted for the purpose of insuring that the alien would receive fair play. Matter of K, 7 I & N Dec. 594 (BIA 1957).