The statute authorizing administrative removal states as a matter of law that someone in administrative removal proceedings is not eligible for discretionary relief even though a person may theoretically be eligible for some sort of relief, such as adjustment of status with a firearms trafficking aggravated felony. 8 U.S.C. 1228(b)(5). As to mandatory forms of relief, the regulations implementing the statute allow for some mechanism to apply for withholding of removal. See 8 CFR 238. A defendant who fears persecution, and who cannot read, could demonstrate that the proceedings are unfair and that the defendant suffered prejudice. Those same regulations allow a person to inspect evidence and challenge the propriety of subjecting him or her to removal on that ground. Judicial review is available for administrative removal, but several courts have rejected 8 U.S.C. 1326 challenges arguing that administrative removal proceedings are inherently unfair because there is no neutral adjudicator. See, e.g., United States v. Rangel De Aguil, 308 F.3d 1134 (10th Cir. 2002).