United States v. Esparza-Ponce, 7 F.Supp.2d
1084 (S.D.Cal. May 18, 1998) (California conviction of theft,
in violation of California Penal Code § 484, could constitute
an "aggravated felony" under INA § 101(a)(43)(G),
8 U.S.C.

Jaggerneuth v. U.S. Atty General, 432
F.3d 1346 (11th Cir. Dec. 19, 2005) (Florida conviction of
grand theft, in violation of Fla. Stat. § 812.014(1), did
not constitute aggravated felony theft, under INA § 101(a)(43)(G),
8 U.S.C.

United States v. Christopher, 239 F.3d
1191 (11th Cir. Jan. 22, 2001), cert. denied, 122 S.Ct. 178
(2001) (Georgia conviction for misdemeanor shoplifting, with
a maximum of one year, qualified as an aggravated felony under
INA § 101(a)(43)(G), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(G), for enhancing
illegal re-entry sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G.

Dalombo Fontes v. Gonzales, ___ F.3d ___, 2007 WL 949590 (1st Cir. March 30, 2007) (rejecting argument that the Board of Immigration Appeals erred in finding noncitizen ineligible for discretionary relief under former INA 212(c) because the crime forming the basis for the aggravated felony/crime of violence finding, first-degree sexual assault, is a "crime involving moral turpitude" under INA 212(a), 8 U.S.C. 1182(a), which does have a counterpart in section 212(a) and is thus waivable under section 212(c)).

Ilchuk v. Attorney General, 434
F.3d 618 (3d Cir. Jan. 17, 2006) (Pennsylvania conviction
of theft of services, in violation of 18 Penn. Consol. Stats.
Ann.

Munroe v. Ashcroft, 353 F.3d 225 (3d Cir.
Dec. 16, 2003) (New Jersey conviction of theft by deception,
N.J.S.A. § 2C: 20-4, held to be aggravated felony fraud conviction
under INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i), 8 U.S.C.

Nugent v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d
162 (3d Cir. May 7, 2004) (Pennsylvania conviction of theft
by deception, in violation of 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 3922(a),
with an indeterminate sentence from a minimum of six months
to a maximum of 23 months, does not trigger removal as an
aggravated felony fraud conviction under INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i),
8 U.S.C.

Soliman
v. Gonzales, 419 F.3d 276 (4th Cir. Aug.

United States v.
Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979 (5th Cir. Oct. 30, 2000), cert. denied,
531 U.S. 1202, 121 S.Ct. 1214 (2001) (federal conviction for
conspiracy to perpetrate a checking and savings account kite
scheme, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b), was an "aggravated
felony," under an attempted theft theory of INA § 101(a)(43)(G),
(U), 8 U.S.C.

Iysheh v.
Gonzales, 437 F.3d 613 (7th Cir. Feb. 1, 2006) (federal conviction
of "conspiracy to transport, receive, possess, etc. stolen
motor vehicles" in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and
2313(a), constituted a fraud aggravated felony, under INA
§ 101(a)(43)(M)(i), 8 U.S.C.